|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Journal of Attention Disorders, Vol. 9, No. 3,
465-475 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1087054705283881
Symptoms Versus Impairment
The Case for Respecting DSM-IVs Criterion D
Michael Gordon
Upstate Medical University, gordonm{at}upstate.edu
Kevin Antshel
Upstate Medical University
Stephen Faraone
Upstate Medical University
Russell Barkley
Upstate Medical University
Larry Lewandowski
Syracuse University
James J. Hudziak
University of Vermont
Joseph Biederman
Harvard Medical School at the Massachusetts General Hospital
Charles Cunningham
McMaster University
Diagnosing ADHD based primarily on symptom reports assumes that the number/frequency of symptoms is tied closely to the impairment imposed on an individuals functioning. That presumed linkage encourages diagnosis more by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.) style symptom lists than well-defined, psychometrically sound assessments of impairment. The current study correlated measures reflecting each construct in four separate, large-scale ADHD research samples. Average correlation between symptoms and impairment accounted for less than 10% of variance. Symptoms never predicted more than 25% of the variance in impairment. When an ADHD group was formed according to a measure of current symptoms, the sample size shrunk by 77% when a criterion-based measure of impairment was added. The partial unlinking of symptoms and impairment has implications for decisions about the diagnostic process, research criteria for participant inclusion, prevalence estimates, gender ratios, evaluation of treatment effects, service delivery, and many other issues.
Key Words: ADHD impairment symptom assessment

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. J. Lewandowski, B. J. Lovett, R. S. Codding, and M. Gordon
Symptoms of ADHD and Academic Concerns in College Students With and Without ADHD Diagnoses
J Atten Disord,
September 1, 2008;
12(2):
156 - 161.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. A. Gathje, L. J. Lewandowski, and M. Gordon
The Role of Impairment in the Diagnosis of ADHD
J Atten Disord,
March 1, 2008;
11(5):
529 - 537.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Mick, S. V. Faraone, T. Spencer, H. F. Zhang, and J. Biederman
Assessing the Validity of the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form in Adults With ADHD
J Atten Disord,
January 1, 2008;
11(4):
504 - 509.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Landgraf
Monitoring Quality of Life in Adults With ADHD: Reliability and Validity of a New Measure
J Atten Disord,
November 1, 2007;
11(3):
351 - 362.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J. Nutt, K. Fone, P. Asherson, D. Bramble, P. Hill, K. Matthews, K. A. Morris, P. Santosh, E. Sonuga-Barke, E. Taylor, et al.
Evidence-based guidelines for management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adolescents in transition to adult services and in adults: recommendations from the British Association for Psychopharmacology
J Psychopharmacol,
January 1, 2007;
21(1):
10 - 41.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. V. Faraone, J. Biederman, T. Spencer, E. Mick, K. Murray, C. Petty, J. J. Adamson, and M. C. Monuteaux
Diagnosing Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: Are Late Onset and Subthreshold Diagnoses Valid?
Am J Psychiatry,
October 1, 2006;
163(10):
1720 - 1729.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Diller and S. Goldstein
Science, ethics, and the psychosocial treatment of ADHD.
J Atten Disord,
May 1, 2006;
9(4):
571 - 574.
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|