Journal of Attention Disorders

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Forbes, G.B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Forbes, G.B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Attention Disorders, Vol. 5, No. 1, 25-40 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/108705470100500103
© 2001 SAGE Publications

A comparison of the Conners' Parent & Teacher Rating Scales, the ADD-H Comprehensive Teacher's Rating Scale, and the Child Behavior Checklist in the clinical diagnosis of ADHD

G.B. Forbes

Effectiveness of popular rating scales in the identification of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) was studied in a homogenous group of 145 teacher- and/or physician-referred 1st through 6th grade children with suspected ADHD.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Atten DisordHome page
J. R. Sullivan and C. A. Riccio
Diagnostic Group Differences in Parent and Teacher Ratings on the BRIEF and Conners' Scales
J Atten Disord, November 1, 2007; 11(3): 398 - 406.
[Abstract] [PDF]