This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Eghbalieh, B. Articles by Swanson, J. M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Eghbalieh, B. Articles by Swanson, J. M. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Prenatal stimulant exposure affects alerting and executive control in six and seven-year-olds

F. M. Crinella

UCI Child Development Center, 19722 MacArthur Blvd., Irvine, CA 92612. Telephone: (949) 824-1801; fax: (949) 824-181 1;fmcrinel{at}uci.edu

L. E. Hunt

Department of Pediatrics, UCI Medical Center, University of California, Irvine.

J. M. Swanson

Department of Pediatrics, Child Development Center, University of California, Irvine.

Attentional processes were investigated in 53 six and seven-year-olds, representing three populations: (1) Follow-ups at a clinic for children who tested positively for cocaine/amphetamine exposure at birth (PSE group; n = 13); (2) children diagnosed with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), with no known history of prenatal stimulant exposure (ADHD group; n = 23); and (3) randomly selected age and demographically matched controls (n = 17). The Continuous Performance Test (CPT) was used to assess two components of attention, the "alerting" system (AS) and the "executive" system (ES). The AS was operationally defined as the ability to sustain reaction speed over blocks of trials, while ES was defined as the ability to inhibit responses to non target stimuli. PSE children had significantly slower hit reaction times than either controls or ADHD children, while ADHD children were slower than controls only for the longest (4-sec) interstimulus interval (ISI) condition. Other reaction time contrasts showed no significant differences between the PSE and ADHD groups. In comparison to controls, both the PSE and ADHD groups showed more variability in reaction times, which increased over time on task, espe cially in the 2- and 4-sec ISI conditions. Both the PSE and ADHD groups committed significantly more impulsive errors than controls but the errors of the ADHD group were associated with time on task and ISI, while errors for the PSE tended to occur more randomly. In summary, PSE children are very much like ADHD children in terms of overall performance configuration, but their behavior deficits tend to be somewhat more pronounced and less predictable from variations in test conditions.

Journal of Attention Disorders, Vol. 4, No. 1, 5-13 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/108705470000400101


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?