| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Modifying the Response Labels of an ADHD Teacher Rating ScalePsychometric and Epidemiologic ImplicationsUniversity of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, arowland{at}salud.unm.edu
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health
University of Texas System Administration
Social & Scientific Systems
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health Objective: To evaluate the impact of changing the response labels of a teacher rating scale in a population-based study of ADHD. Method: For parents, the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, which asks whether each of 18 symptoms occurred "often" in the past year, was used. For teachers, most scales use a 4-point scale, with often and very often as the two highest categories. To make the two instruments more compatible, the authors created a teacher rating scale with often as the highest category. Teachers rated more than 6,000 elementary school students using this instrument. Some teachers completed ratings using both questionnaire formats. Results: The scale's internal consistency, convergent validity, and test-retest reliability are excellent. The factor structure is consistent with established DSM-IV-based instruments. Response category choices influence the proportion of children exceeding symptom and impairment thresholds. Conclusion: Altering the response scale does not degrade the psychometric properties of the instrument but makes important differences in the sample. (J. of Att. Dis. 2007; 11(3) 384-397 )
Key Words: ADHD attention deficit disorder attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity rating scales psychometrics epidemiology confirmatory factor analysis Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Journal of Attention Disorders, Vol. 11, No. 3,
384-397 (2007) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||